Is Capital Punishment Immoral Essay - 1525 Words

Is Capital Punishment Immoral? In a Kantian world with moral laws, capital punishment does not seem to be a theoretical solution for punishing murders. But when someone does commit murder those individuals render their rights, and henceforth would acknowledge their action with consequences, such as capital punishment. Jeffrey H. Reiman presents various arguments against the use of capital punishment with no adequate evidence of effectiveness, but I disagree. Capital punishment is a reasonable method to punish offenders for crimes committed, and is used for extremes heinous acts; it is also used under great scrutiny before death penalty is executed. Instead, Reimn conveys the notion that any violation of moral duties should be dealt with that same manner to the offender. If a victim was raped, then the offender should be raped as well. While this type of thinking is not entirely incorrect, in a Kantian world it would have be proportionate and not penalized with exact same crime. Thus, if a victim was raped, then the offender would have to undergo a punishment that would suffice for the crime committed. The rapper could be punished by being sentenced to a reasonable time in incarceration. Therefore, the process of punishment does not have to fit what actions the violator performed on the victim. The rape scenario would be an extreme circumstance of criminal acts, but if the scenario was changed to another violation such as jaywalking. The whole idea of jaywalking would beShow MoreRelatedIs life in prison without parole better than the death penalty?812 Words   |  4 Pagesthe state as a punishment for an offense. What the death penalty itself serves is retribution and revenge. Many believe that this is the right way to punish criminals in society, although there are many faults with capital punishment as well. Those faults consist of errors in the system, state costs, and the risks of executions of innocent people. Life in prison without parole is better than the death penalty where the death penalty is the foundation in injustice and it is immoral. People supportingRead MorePhilosophy Ethics and the Death Penalty1083 Words   |  5 PagesVan den Haag strongly contends the need for capital punishment in our society in his article. Van den Haag provides a substantial amount of convincing facts and information to support â€Å"The Ultimate Punishment†. Van den Haag discusses such topics as maldistribution, deterrence to society, miscarriages of the penalty, and incidental and political issues (cost, relative suffering, and brutalization). The death penalty is indeed the harshest/ultimate punishment a convicted criminal can receive in our societyRead MoreCapital Punishment And The Death Penalty1714 Words   |  7 PagesCapital punishment, or the death penalty is the legally authorized death of an individual as punishment for a heinous crime, typically one that involves murder. The legality of it varies by state and it continues to be a contentious topic of discussion in the United States. Furthermore, in recent decades, p ublic opinion has been shifting from a supportive stance to an unsupportive stance on the use of the death penalty. It is now perceived by most people to be an unethical, immoral, and expensiveRead MoreThe Moral Framework I Disagree1377 Words   |  6 PagesThe moral framework I tend to personally abide by is act utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the ethical concept that the actions that lead to the most pleasure are moral and good, whereas those that lead to pain are an immoral evil (Boss 23). When making decisions, I contemplate the advantages and disadvantages of each option presented before acting upon it. In addition, I consider those who would possibly be affected by my decision both positively and negatively. Like utilitarianism, I choose theRead More Capital Punishment Essay1685 Words   |  7 PagesCapital Punishment Works Cited Not Included Capital Punishment was basically thought of for the good of society. The objective of Capital Punishment is to stop people from committing violent and offensive acts. Capital Punishment or the death penalty has failed however, to prevent or discourage crime. Moreover, it is cruel and gruesome. At present there are five methods of execution. The most commonly used form of execution is by lethal injection. In this method the convict is first injectedRead MoreThe Death Penalty : Costly, Counterproductive, And Corrupting1678 Words   |  7 Pagescrime: costly, counterproductive and corrupting; 35 Santa Clara Law Review 1211 (1995) Summary paragraph: In Stephen Bright’s article, â€Å"The Death Penalty as the Answer to Crime: Costly, Counterproductive, and Corrupting† Bright asserts that capital punishment does not work because it is racially biased, the quality of the lawyers and attorneys supplied by the state to poor defendants is unfair, and that the law system currently in place does not accomplish its true goals. Bright defends his claimRead MoreEssay about Capital Punishment and The Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon1003 Words   |  5 PagesCapital punishment dates back to 18th century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon. Under this code twenty five crimes, excluding murder, were punishable by death. In historical data, the first death penalty was imposed to offender who was blamed for magic in 16th century BC Egypt (Regio, 1997). Unfortunately, death penalty is still practiced in some countries. For example, in Egypt recently on 24 March 2014, Minya Criminal Court imposed death penalty to 529 foll owers of Egyptian ex-presidentRead MoreAgainst The Death Penalty Essay959 Words   |  4 PagesAgainst the Death Penalty â€Å"Murder is wrong† (â€Å"Capital Punishment†). We’ve been taught this indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is defined as one human taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder. There are as many as thirty-six states with the death penalty, and it’s essential that they change it. The United States needs the death penalty abolished because it is filled with flaws, cruel and immoral, and is an ineffective means of deterrent forRead MoreEssay about Capital Punishment904 Words   |  4 Pagesnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Capital punishment is a method of retributive punishment as old as civilization itself. Anti-death penalty supporters argue the death penalty is unconstitutional. Capital punishment is a barbaric remnant of an uncivilized society. It is immoral in principle, and unfair, and discriminatory in practice. It assures the execution of some innocent people. As a remedy for crime, it has no purp ose and no effect. The arguments against capital punishment are many and cogent. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;CapitalRead More Capital Punishment Essay664 Words   |  3 Pages Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the hardest form of punishment enforced in the United States today. It is a controversial issue that continues to be debated by the American public. Most of the factors people do not agree on the issue of Capital punishment is immoral and for this reason should not be allowed in our society. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;On the other hand, there are many reasons for the support of Capital punishment. Capital punishment protects the innocent

Is Capital Punishment Immoral Essay - 1525 Words

Is Capital Punishment Immoral? In a Kantian world with moral laws, capital punishment does not seem to be a theoretical solution for punishing murders. But when someone does commit murder those individuals render their rights, and henceforth would acknowledge their action with consequences, such as capital punishment. Jeffrey H. Reiman presents various arguments against the use of capital punishment with no adequate evidence of effectiveness, but I disagree. Capital punishment is a reasonable method to punish offenders for crimes committed, and is used for extremes heinous acts; it is also used under great scrutiny before death penalty is executed. Instead, Reimn conveys the notion that any violation of moral duties should be dealt with that same manner to the offender. If a victim was raped, then the offender should be raped as well. While this type of thinking is not entirely incorrect, in a Kantian world it would have be proportionate and not penalized with exact same crime. Thus, if a victim was raped, then the offender would have to undergo a punishment that would suffice for the crime committed. The rapper could be punished by being sentenced to a reasonable time in incarceration. Therefore, the process of punishment does not have to fit what actions the violator performed on the victim. The rape scenario would be an extreme circumstance of criminal acts, but if the scenario was changed to another violation such as jaywalking. The whole idea of jaywalking would beShow MoreRelatedIs life in prison without parole better than the death penalty?812 Words   |  4 Pagesthe state as a punishment for an offense. What the death penalty itself serves is retribution and revenge. Many believe that this is the right way to punish criminals in society, although there are many faults with capital punishment as well. Those faults consist of errors in the system, state costs, and the risks of executions of innocent people. Life in prison without parole is better than the death penalty where the death penalty is the foundation in injustice and it is immoral. People supportingRead MorePhilosophy Ethics and the Death Penalty1083 Words   |  5 PagesVan den Haag strongly contends the need for capital punishment in our society in his article. Van den Haag provides a substantial amount of convincing facts and information to support â€Å"The Ultimate Punishment†. Van den Haag discusses such topics as maldistribution, deterrence to society, miscarriages of the penalty, and incidental and political issues (cost, relative suffering, and brutalization). The death penalty is indeed the harshest/ultimate punishment a convicted criminal can receive in our societyRead MoreCapital Punishment And The Death Penalty1714 Words   |  7 PagesCapital punishment, or the death penalty is the legally authorized death of an individual as punishment for a heinous crime, typically one that involves murder. The legality of it varies by state and it continues to be a contentious topic of discussion in the United States. Furthermore, in recent decades, p ublic opinion has been shifting from a supportive stance to an unsupportive stance on the use of the death penalty. It is now perceived by most people to be an unethical, immoral, and expensiveRead MoreThe Moral Framework I Disagree1377 Words   |  6 PagesThe moral framework I tend to personally abide by is act utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the ethical concept that the actions that lead to the most pleasure are moral and good, whereas those that lead to pain are an immoral evil (Boss 23). When making decisions, I contemplate the advantages and disadvantages of each option presented before acting upon it. In addition, I consider those who would possibly be affected by my decision both positively and negatively. Like utilitarianism, I choose theRead More Capital Punishment Essay1685 Words   |  7 PagesCapital Punishment Works Cited Not Included Capital Punishment was basically thought of for the good of society. The objective of Capital Punishment is to stop people from committing violent and offensive acts. Capital Punishment or the death penalty has failed however, to prevent or discourage crime. Moreover, it is cruel and gruesome. At present there are five methods of execution. The most commonly used form of execution is by lethal injection. In this method the convict is first injectedRead MoreThe Death Penalty : Costly, Counterproductive, And Corrupting1678 Words   |  7 Pagescrime: costly, counterproductive and corrupting; 35 Santa Clara Law Review 1211 (1995) Summary paragraph: In Stephen Bright’s article, â€Å"The Death Penalty as the Answer to Crime: Costly, Counterproductive, and Corrupting† Bright asserts that capital punishment does not work because it is racially biased, the quality of the lawyers and attorneys supplied by the state to poor defendants is unfair, and that the law system currently in place does not accomplish its true goals. Bright defends his claimRead MoreEssay about Capital Punishment and The Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon1003 Words   |  5 PagesCapital punishment dates back to 18th century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon. Under this code twenty five crimes, excluding murder, were punishable by death. In historical data, the first death penalty was imposed to offender who was blamed for magic in 16th century BC Egypt (Regio, 1997). Unfortunately, death penalty is still practiced in some countries. For example, in Egypt recently on 24 March 2014, Minya Criminal Court imposed death penalty to 529 foll owers of Egyptian ex-presidentRead MoreAgainst The Death Penalty Essay959 Words   |  4 PagesAgainst the Death Penalty â€Å"Murder is wrong† (â€Å"Capital Punishment†). We’ve been taught this indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is defined as one human taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder. There are as many as thirty-six states with the death penalty, and it’s essential that they change it. The United States needs the death penalty abolished because it is filled with flaws, cruel and immoral, and is an ineffective means of deterrent forRead MoreEssay about Capital Punishment904 Words   |  4 Pagesnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Capital punishment is a method of retributive punishment as old as civilization itself. Anti-death penalty supporters argue the death penalty is unconstitutional. Capital punishment is a barbaric remnant of an uncivilized society. It is immoral in principle, and unfair, and discriminatory in practice. It assures the execution of some innocent people. As a remedy for crime, it has no purp ose and no effect. The arguments against capital punishment are many and cogent. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;CapitalRead More Capital Punishment Essay664 Words   |  3 Pages Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the hardest form of punishment enforced in the United States today. It is a controversial issue that continues to be debated by the American public. Most of the factors people do not agree on the issue of Capital punishment is immoral and for this reason should not be allowed in our society. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;On the other hand, there are many reasons for the support of Capital punishment. Capital punishment protects the innocent

Is Capital Punishment Immoral Essay - 1525 Words

Is Capital Punishment Immoral? In a Kantian world with moral laws, capital punishment does not seem to be a theoretical solution for punishing murders. But when someone does commit murder those individuals render their rights, and henceforth would acknowledge their action with consequences, such as capital punishment. Jeffrey H. Reiman presents various arguments against the use of capital punishment with no adequate evidence of effectiveness, but I disagree. Capital punishment is a reasonable method to punish offenders for crimes committed, and is used for extremes heinous acts; it is also used under great scrutiny before death penalty is executed. Instead, Reimn conveys the notion that any violation of moral duties should be dealt with that same manner to the offender. If a victim was raped, then the offender should be raped as well. While this type of thinking is not entirely incorrect, in a Kantian world it would have be proportionate and not penalized with exact same crime. Thus, if a victim was raped, then the offender would have to undergo a punishment that would suffice for the crime committed. The rapper could be punished by being sentenced to a reasonable time in incarceration. Therefore, the process of punishment does not have to fit what actions the violator performed on the victim. The rape scenario would be an extreme circumstance of criminal acts, but if the scenario was changed to another violation such as jaywalking. The whole idea of jaywalking would beShow MoreRelatedIs life in prison without parole better than the death penalty?812 Words   |  4 Pagesthe state as a punishment for an offense. What the death penalty itself serves is retribution and revenge. Many believe that this is the right way to punish criminals in society, although there are many faults with capital punishment as well. Those faults consist of errors in the system, state costs, and the risks of executions of innocent people. Life in prison without parole is better than the death penalty where the death penalty is the foundation in injustice and it is immoral. People supportingRead MorePhilosophy Ethics and the Death Penalty1083 Words   |  5 PagesVan den Haag strongly contends the need for capital punishment in our society in his article. Van den Haag provides a substantial amount of convincing facts and information to support â€Å"The Ultimate Punishment†. Van den Haag discusses such topics as maldistribution, deterrence to society, miscarriages of the penalty, and incidental and political issues (cost, relative suffering, and brutalization). The death penalty is indeed the harshest/ultimate punishment a convicted criminal can receive in our societyRead MoreCapital Punishment And The Death Penalty1714 Words   |  7 PagesCapital punishment, or the death penalty is the legally authorized death of an individual as punishment for a heinous crime, typically one that involves murder. The legality of it varies by state and it continues to be a contentious topic of discussion in the United States. Furthermore, in recent decades, p ublic opinion has been shifting from a supportive stance to an unsupportive stance on the use of the death penalty. It is now perceived by most people to be an unethical, immoral, and expensiveRead MoreThe Moral Framework I Disagree1377 Words   |  6 PagesThe moral framework I tend to personally abide by is act utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the ethical concept that the actions that lead to the most pleasure are moral and good, whereas those that lead to pain are an immoral evil (Boss 23). When making decisions, I contemplate the advantages and disadvantages of each option presented before acting upon it. In addition, I consider those who would possibly be affected by my decision both positively and negatively. Like utilitarianism, I choose theRead More Capital Punishment Essay1685 Words   |  7 PagesCapital Punishment Works Cited Not Included Capital Punishment was basically thought of for the good of society. The objective of Capital Punishment is to stop people from committing violent and offensive acts. Capital Punishment or the death penalty has failed however, to prevent or discourage crime. Moreover, it is cruel and gruesome. At present there are five methods of execution. The most commonly used form of execution is by lethal injection. In this method the convict is first injectedRead MoreThe Death Penalty : Costly, Counterproductive, And Corrupting1678 Words   |  7 Pagescrime: costly, counterproductive and corrupting; 35 Santa Clara Law Review 1211 (1995) Summary paragraph: In Stephen Bright’s article, â€Å"The Death Penalty as the Answer to Crime: Costly, Counterproductive, and Corrupting† Bright asserts that capital punishment does not work because it is racially biased, the quality of the lawyers and attorneys supplied by the state to poor defendants is unfair, and that the law system currently in place does not accomplish its true goals. Bright defends his claimRead MoreEssay about Capital Punishment and The Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon1003 Words   |  5 PagesCapital punishment dates back to 18th century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon. Under this code twenty five crimes, excluding murder, were punishable by death. In historical data, the first death penalty was imposed to offender who was blamed for magic in 16th century BC Egypt (Regio, 1997). Unfortunately, death penalty is still practiced in some countries. For example, in Egypt recently on 24 March 2014, Minya Criminal Court imposed death penalty to 529 foll owers of Egyptian ex-presidentRead MoreAgainst The Death Penalty Essay959 Words   |  4 PagesAgainst the Death Penalty â€Å"Murder is wrong† (â€Å"Capital Punishment†). We’ve been taught this indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is defined as one human taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder. There are as many as thirty-six states with the death penalty, and it’s essential that they change it. The United States needs the death penalty abolished because it is filled with flaws, cruel and immoral, and is an ineffective means of deterrent forRead MoreEssay about Capital Punishment904 Words   |  4 Pagesnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Capital punishment is a method of retributive punishment as old as civilization itself. Anti-death penalty supporters argue the death penalty is unconstitutional. Capital punishment is a barbaric remnant of an uncivilized society. It is immoral in principle, and unfair, and discriminatory in practice. It assures the execution of some innocent people. As a remedy for crime, it has no purp ose and no effect. The arguments against capital punishment are many and cogent. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;CapitalRead More Capital Punishment Essay664 Words   |  3 Pages Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the hardest form of punishment enforced in the United States today. It is a controversial issue that continues to be debated by the American public. Most of the factors people do not agree on the issue of Capital punishment is immoral and for this reason should not be allowed in our society. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;On the other hand, there are many reasons for the support of Capital punishment. Capital punishment protects the innocent

Printing Free Essays

In the 1430’s a man named Johann Gutenberg created the predecessor to the modern printing press. The level of importance of the printing press is rivaled by few other inventions, so much so that â€Å"the invention of the printing press† is often used as a reference to the social, political, and scientific change experienced by Europe after the press’s introduction. (Wikipedia). We will write a custom essay sample on Printing or any similar topic only for you Order Now Johannes Gutenberg invented a mechanical way of making books. This was the first example of mass book production. Before the invention of printing, multiple copies of a manuscript had to be made by hand, a laborious task that could take many years. Later books were produced by and for the church using the process of wood engraving. This required the craftsman to cut away the background, leaving the area to be printed raised. This process applied to both text and illustrations was extremely time consuming. When a page was complete, often by joining several blocks together, it would be inked and a sheet of paper was then pressed over it far an imprint. The susceptibility of wood to the elements gave such blocks a limited lifespan. When Johannes Gutenberg began building his press in 1436, he was unlikely to have realized that he was giving birth to an art form which would take center stage in the social and industrial revolutions which followed. The most important aspect of his invention was that it was the first form of printing to use movable type. His initial efforts enabled him in 1440 to mass-produce indulgences – printed slips of paper sold by the Catholic Church to remit temporal punishments in purgatory for sins committed in this life, for those wealthy enough to afford indulgences. Gutenberg’s invention spread rapidly after his death in 1468. It met in general with a ready, and as enthusiastic reception in the centers of culture. The names of more than 1000 printers, mostly of German origin, have come down to us from the fifteenth century. In Italy we find well over 100 German printers, in France 30, in Spain 26. Many of the earliest printers outside of Germany had learned their art in Mainz Gutenberg’s Home and where they were know as â€Å"goldsmiths†. Among those who were undeniably pupils of Gutenberg, and who probably were also assistants in the Guttenberg printing ouse. The new printing presses had spread like brushfire through Europe. By 1499 print-houses had become established in more than 2500 cities in Europe. Fifteen million books had been flung into a world where scholars would travel miles to visit a library stocked with twenty hand-written volumes. Scholars argue about the number. It could’ve been as few as eight million or as many as twenty four million all within 50 years of the printing presses invention. But the output of new books had been staggering by any reasonable estimate. The people had suddenly come into possession of some thirty thousand new book titles. While the Gutenberg press was much more efficient than manual copying, the industrial Revolution and the introduction of the steam powered rotary press allowed thousands of copies of a page in a single day. Mass production of printed works flourished after the transition to rolled paper, as continuous feed allowed the presses to run at a much faster pace. Gutenberg’s invention did not make him rich, but it laid the foundation for the commercial mass production of books. The success of printing meant that books soon became cheaper, and ever wider parts of the population could afford them. More than ever before, it enabled people to follow debates and take part in discussion of matters that concerned them. As a consequence, the printed book also led to more stringent attempts at censorship. This was a sign that it was felt by those in authority to be dangerous and challenging to their position. The spread of literacy and the development of universities meant that by the 15th century, despite an assembly line approach to the production of books, supply was no longer able to meet demand. As a result there was widespread interest in finding an alternative means of producing books. Before books could be mass produced, several developments were necessary. A ready supply of suitable material that could be printed on was required. Manuscript books were written on Vellum and this material was used for some early printed books, but vellum was expensive and not available in sufficient quantity for the mass production of books. The introduction of the technique of making paper and the subsequent development of a European apermaking industry was a necessary condition for the widespread adoption of print technology. Although a number of people had previously attempted to make metal type or had experimented with individual woodcut letters, it was not until a technique was devised for producing metal type in large quantities at a reasonable cost. This involved the design of a type-face and the production of molds used for making the individual pieces of type as well as the development of an alloy that was soft enough to cast yet hard enough to use for printing. It was also necessary to develop suitable inks for printing with the new type. The water-based inks used for hand lettering and for block printing will not stick to metal type; therefore a viscous oil based ink was required. Finally, a press was needed for transferring the image from type to paper. Precedents existed in the presses used for making wine, cheese and paper and one of Johannes Gutenberg’s innovations was to adapt these presses for the printing process. An operator worked a lever to increase and decrease the pressure of the block against the paper. The invention of the printing press, in turn, set off a revolution that is still in progress today. Look around wherever you are, and you’ll likely find plenty of printed material, from business cards to brochures to books. Printing words and images on paper may seem like one of the more environmentally benign things that printing does, but that isn’t necessarily the case. If you examine the life cycle of printed matter – from turning trees into paper through the witch’s brew of chemicals involved — professional printing takes on a decidedly non-green hue. Typically, the process involves a variety of inks, solvents, acids, resins, lacquers, dyes, driers, extenders, modifiers, varnishes, shellacs, and other solutions. Only a few of these ingredients end up directly on the printed page. Many of the ingredients are toxic: Silver, lead, chromium, cadmium, toluene, chloroform, methylene chloride, barium-based pigments, and acrylic copolymers. And that’s mot all. Chlorine bleaching of paper is linked to cancer-causing water pollutants. Waste inks and solvents are usually considered hazardous. Bindings, adhesives, foils, and plastic bags used in printing or packaging printed material can render paper unrecyclable. And you thought it was just ink on paper. Not everyone defines â€Å"green printing† the same way and there is no standard of certification for what makes a printer green. There are several things a printer can do to minimize the detrimental effects to the environment. In general, an environmentally minded printer should use the most eco-friendly papers available, reduce or eliminate toxic chemicals, waste ink, and solvents. The printer should also be willing to use soy or other vegetable inks, educate customers about how to reduce a project’s environmental impact. Green printing is on a roll, moving beyond small, do-good companies and activist groups to larger corporations and government agencies that have mandates to purchase greener goods and services. As demand for green printing has grown, so too has the number of printers offering such services. Many printers now days can recycle up to 98% of there wastes and more and more or doing just that. Life magazine called the printing press the greatest invention in the last 1000 years. How to cite Printing, Essay examples

William Shakespeare Analysis Essay Example For Students

William Shakespeare Analysis Essay William Shakespeare was born in 1564. Elizabeth I was the queen at this time. He was born in Stratford-Upon-Avon. He went to the local grammar school, but did not go to university. When he was 20, he moved to London and became a playwright and an actor. In about 1603, he retired from acting and being a playwright and returned to Stratford. He was very rich by this time and bought the biggest house in the town. He finally died in 1616. Romeo and Juliet is a play where two families (The Montagues and the Capulets) dont like each other. Romeo meets Juliet and they fall in love. They marry in secrecy, Romeo kills someone and is banished from the city. At this news, Juliet takes a sleeping potion that gives the belief that she is dead. Romeo gets a message saying Juliet is dead, so Romeo has to go and see her. Because of the thought of life without Juliet, Romeo also takes a potion, but his is a potion that will kill him. When Juliet comes round and sees Romeo dead, she kills herself. We will write a custom essay on William Shakespeare Analysis specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now At the time Romeo and Juliet was written, Shakespeare had mostly written mostly comedies and had only written one tragedy. This probably means that the audience were probably expecting a comedy rather than a tragedy. I think that in those days, people went to plays because of the reputation of the writer. In modern times, people know what to expect like a comedy character in Mercutio and a villain in Tybalt, and they know that people are going to die. People go to the plays because of the reputation of the Author and the culture. I think that conflict is a central part of the play because it is a tragedy. The reason I think this is because there would need to be some conflict because people are going to die. Also, the conflict helps emphases the hatred between the two families. When Romeo kills Paris at the end, it emphasises his love for Juliet. The first area of conflict comes right at the start of the play. This is when Samson and Gregory, two servants from each family, have an argument about who has the better manhood. After this, Gregory bites his thumb at Samson; this causes the pair to fight. The next area of conflict comes in act 3 scene 1. This involves Tybalt, Romeo, Mercutio and Benvolio. Tybalt comes into the scene looking for Romeo, but instead, Tybalt and Mercutio. This involves a lot of insults such as Mercutio reacting to Tybalt entering By my heel, I care not. , Or Tybalt saying to Romeo: Thou art a villain, and when Mercutio interrupts Romeo and Tybalts argument by saying O calm, dishonourable fool, vile submission!. These insults show the hatred between Mercutio and Tybalt and Tybalt and Romeo, but not Romeo and Tybalt. They are about to have a fight when Romeo enters the scene. This diverts Tybalts attention on to Romeo and away from Mercutio. Tybalt wants to fight Romeo, but Romeo doesnt want to fight Tybalt because he is secretly his cousin. Because of this, Mercutio stands up for Romeo and fights Tybalt. Romeo breaks up the fight because he cant face his best mate and cousin fighting each other. When Mercutio turns to walk away, Tybalt stabs him in his bac k. Mercutio still tries to insult Tybalt saying: Tis but a scratch! . This shows that he wants to try and get the last word in between them before he dies. The next area of conflict follows on from the Tybalt and Mercutio fight. Romeo, full of emotion at the loss of his best mate, now doesnt care that Tybalt is his cousin, and just wants revenge in Mercutios honour. The fight escalates from an argument between Romeo and Tybalt into a full on fight with weapons. At the end of the fight, Romeo stabs Tybalt and Tybalt dies. .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385 , .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385 .postImageUrl , .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385 , .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385:hover , .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385:visited , .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385:active { border:0!important; } .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385:active , .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385 .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uf17bca73f8d8611778774081dc334385:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Crucible Story EssayThe next area of significant conflict comes in act 3 scene 5. This involves Capulet, Lady Capulet, Juliet and the nurse. The argument arises because Juliet reveals that she doesnt want to marry Paris because she doesnt love him. This news makes Capulet tremendously angry because he feels that Paris is the perfect man for Juliet. He even goes as for as to say: Young baggage, disobedient wretchGet thee to a churchSpeak not, reply not, do not answer me! My fingers itchout on her!. This shows that he has really strong feelings about Juliet marring Paris. At the end of the argument, Juliet turns to the nurse in the hope of getting some backing, to Juliet s horror; she basically says that she doesnt have a choice and that she should marry Paris. The last area of significant conflict is when Romeo goes to Juliets tomb. This causes conflict because Paris is already there. Paris is full of emotion because of the apparent death of Juliet as so is Romeo because he hasnt seen her because he was banned from Verona for killing Tybalt. Paris challenges Romeo to fight and Romeo accepts. They fight and Romeo kills Paris. After this, he goes into the tomb to see Juliet, whom he thinks is dead. He is so upset that he takes a poises potion and kills himself. When Juliet comes round, she sees Romeo lying dead next to her and kills herself. The first conflict arises between Gregory and Sampson, because Sampson says things like Let us take the law of our sides. Then later, he bites his thumb at Gregory, which in Shakespeares day was very offensive. After that, Sampson says: I serve as good a man as you. But Abram doesnt accept this and replies: No better? this makes Sampson very worried and he doesnt know what to reply with and asks Gregory who says: Say better. Sampson takes this advice and says: Yes better. Abram doesnt believe him and says: You lie! At this, they start fighting. This area of conflict shows that the servants are proud of their masters, and that at the low level of the servants, the hatred is still rife. This area of conflict is an essential part of the play because it introduces the hatred between the two families and it is a dramatic start, which grabs the audiences attention straight away. The conflict in act 3 scene 1 between Mercutio and Tybalt really starts to rise when Romeo enters. When Romeo dos enter, Mercutio and Tybalt are squaring up to each other, but as Romeo enters, Tybalt says: Peace be with you, here comes my man. This shows that Tybalt is an all round bad character and he will cause conflict between anyone. After an argument, Mercutio says: O calm dishonourable vile submission, put up your sword and fight! Tybalt agrees to this and draws his sword. While they are fighting, Romeo breaks them up and tells them to stop fighting because he cant take his best mate and cousin fighting. Mercutio drops his sword, but as he is walking away, Tybalt stabs him in the back. This turns the audience against Tybalt as it shows that he is the villain and the audience dont like them. This is a major piece of conflict because it makes Romeo very angry and it leads to the next conflict. The next area of significant conflict between Romeo and Tybalt is already at boiling point because of Tybalt murdering Mercutio. In the short conversation between romeo and Tybalt before romeo kills Tybalt, romeo calls Tybalt a Villain and Tybalt calls Romeo a Retched boy at which Romeo would have been very affected by that, and would have made him even more angry and made romeo even more prepared to murder Tybalt. This has a big impact because it results in Romeo being banned from Verona. This puts the audience in several different minds; First of all, they are upset that Romeo has been banished from Verona, whereas on the second hand, he could have been killed for murdering someone else. But at least Tybalt is out of the play. .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85 , .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85 .postImageUrl , .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85 , .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85:hover , .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85:visited , .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85:active { border:0!important; } .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85:active , .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85 .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ud8a724a24416ec78b14e032e24f68e85:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Carole Satymurtis EssayIn the big argument between Capulet and Juliet, it escalates from difference of opinion, Juliet revealing that she doesnt want to marry Paris by saying Not proud you have, but thankful you have: Proud can never be of what I hate, but thankful even for hate that is meant love. This infuriates Capulet and he threatens Juliet that if she doesnt marry Paris, then he will throw her out onto the street by saying Graze where you will, you shall not house with meAnd you be not, hang, beg, starve, die in the streets. This shows just how serious he is and how much he thinks he has found the perfect man for Juliet and he feels teat she is just throwing his eff orts back in his face and for that, he is throwing her out of the house. Even though this conflict is not a violent one, it is just as powerful as a violent one, because it has a deep effect on the audiences emotions. The last area of conflict is when Romeo goes to see Juliet at her tomb and Paris is there. Juliet is lying there because she took a sleeping potion, which would give the belief that she is dead. She took this potion to get out of marrying Paris. The conflict between Romeo and Paris escalates when Romeo says : Good gentle youth, tempt not a desperate man, fly hence and leave me. But Paris doesnt agree with this and says: I do defy thy conjunction. I can imagine the audience being shocked at this, because it would be obvious that Romeo is angry and ready to fight and kill anyone that gets in the way. After this, Romeo and Paris fight, which results in Paris dieing. After this fight, Romeo goes through to see Juliet and sees her looking dead and drinks his own poison potion and dies. Then Juliet wakes up and sees Romeo dead beside her, so she kisses the lips of Romeo and takes the potion and she dies. This is a dramatic ending to the play, which is good, because it keeps it in the audie nces minds. In my mind, there are only two types of conflict, they are: violent conflict and mental conflict. The violent conflict occurs in all but one of the major, effective areas conflict. The mental conflict is the argument between Juliet and Capulet and I think this is one of the more effective conflicts because it is a mental one and it sticks in the mind. Violent conflict is more vital for dramatic effect because it can emphases hatred and brings death, whereas, mental is good for emotional effect because it lasts longer in the audiences mind. Overall, I think that the conflict in the play is good, because it keeps the audience on the edge of their seats and hooked on the play.

Absolutist Governments essays

Absolutist Governments essays The rise of absolute monarchs in the seventeenth century was a result of numerous unrelated things and events. The development of the idea of the Divine Right of Kings, and the publishing of Thomas Hobbes work, Leviathan, provided the justification the Monarchs needed to further their pursuit of wealth, land, and trade opportunities. It also provided the way to appease their conscience, as they overtook and abused indigenous peoples. The breakdown of the feudal system was throwing country after country into unrest. This also helped to make this idea of absolutism popular, even within the general population. In France around the middle of the seventeenth century, a revolution against the current monarch, Cardinal Mazarin, threw France into disarray. When the Cardinal died in 1661, Louis XVI (whom the Cardinal had been governing for), took power and became the strong absolute ruler that France had been looking for. He took hold of the country and put himself at the head of the government, and as a result order was restored. In this way, Louis XVI instigated an absolutism that was popular with the citizens of France (p. 432-433, Textbook). There were many absolutist monarchs throughout Europe during this time period, including Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain. Although England had not tended towards an absolute monarchy, eventually when James I came to power, this idea prevailed there as well (p.420, Textbook). This absolutist government was justified by Jacques-Benigne Bossuet, who believed in a theory called the Divine Right of Kings. He argued that kings ruled because they were chosen by God to do so, and that these kings were accountable to no person except God. The king ruled by virtue of Gods authority, so he should be obeyed in all things. No group, whether the nobles, the people on the street, or even Parliament, had the right to question this rule, for to do so was to rebel against God (p.43...

A Collection of Famous Quotations About Love

A Collection of Famous Quotations About Love What do Victor Hugo, Carl Jung, John Lennon, Louisa May Alcott, and Socrates have in common? The answer is that they have all commented on the ways of love. Saints, philosophers, psychologists, playwrights, and poets have left their  views of love for us to read. From ancient scrolls to classic plays, modern films, and songs, love is a timeless subject. Explore these  famous love quotes. Carl Jung Where love rules, there is no will to power; and where power predominates, there love is lacking. The one is the shadow of the other. Sigmund Freud Love and work are the cornerstones of our humanness. Victor Hugo The greatest happiness of life is the conviction that we are loved. Dante Alighieri He loves but little who can say and count in words, how much he loves. George Bernard Shaw Love is a gross exaggeration of the difference between one person and everybody else. John Barrymore Love is the delightful interval between meeting a beautiful girl and discovering that she looks like a haddock. Sigmund Freud We are never so helplessly unhappy as when we lose love. Lord Alfred Tennyson He that shuts love out, in turn, shall be Shut out from love and on her threshold lie, Howling in outer darkness. Louisa May Alcott Love is a great beautifier. Nat King Cole The greatest thing you ever learn is just to love and be loved in return. William Makepeace Thackeray It is best to love wisely, no doubt; but to love foolishly is better than not to be able to love at all. Socrates The hottest love has the coldest end. Henry Drummond You will find as you look back upon your life that the moments when you have really lived are the moments when you have done things in the spirit of love. John Lennon Love is the flower youve got to let grow. Thomas Moore But theres nothing half so sweet in life As loves young dream. George Moore The hours I spend with you I look upon as sort of a perfumed garden, a dim twilight, and a fountain singing to it. You and you alone make me feel that I am alive. Other men, it is said have seen angels, but I have seen thee and thou art enough. William Shakespeare If love be rough with you, be rough with love. Prick love for pricking you and beat love down. Margaret Atwood The Eskimos had fifty-two names for snow because it was important to them: there ought to be as many for love. Gloria Gaither Line by line, moment by moment, special times are etched into our memories in the permanent ink of everlasting love in our relationships. Nicholas Sparks You are every reason, every  hope, and every dream Ive ever had. Elisabeth Elliot You are loved with an everlasting love. And underneath are the everlasting arms. From the movie Twilight: Breaking Dawn Part 1 No measure of time with you will be long enough. But lets start with forever. If you enjoy reading popular quotes, see  Drake love quotes and Bob Marley quotes.